Diagnosing Team Trust and Psychological Safety

Episode Number

61

Explore the difference between trust and psychological safety, the questions that help you work out what is really happening, and a simple four-quadrant map leaders can return to again and again.

In this episode, I’m continuing what has accidentally become a three-part mini series on psychological safety, trust, and what leaders can do when something in the team feels off.

I talk through why it is so important to diagnose first, rather than rushing straight into action with a generic fix that might miss the real issue.

We explore the difference between trust and psychological safety, the questions that help you work out what is really happening, and a simple four-quadrant map leaders can return to again and again.

This is about noticing patterns, looking honestly at your own behaviour, and taking brave, practical steps to strengthen the team.

(01:38) – Why leaders need to diagnose before jumping into action
(02:40) – The key difference between one-to-one trust and group safety
(06:42) – Why teams move around the map instead of climbing a ladder
(08:45) – What low trust and low safety can quietly look like
(15:27) – How leaders can accidentally turn meetings into performance spaces
(23:28) – Why honest self-reflection has to come before action

Share:

More Podcast Episodes

The SCARF Model Every Leader Should Know

I’m exploring how the brain’s bias towards threat detection can shape behaviour at work, and why resistance, disengagement or conflict may not be an attitude problem at all.